Final answer:
Neither statement regarding the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms recommending voting rights for women nor the Government of India Act of 1935 providing reserved seats for women in the legislature is correct. The correct answer is (d) neither 1 nor 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
The provided statements about the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms and the Government of India Act of 1935 are not accurate in the context given. The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms of 1919 did not recommend granting voting rights to all women above the age of 21. The reforms were related to the administration of India under British rule and were focused on constitutional reforms, which included a limited expansion of participation for Indians in the governance process, but it did not specifically deal with women's suffrage. Voting rights for women in Britain - which at the time would have been a closer approximation of what was envisioned for women's suffrage in India - were still highly restricted at that time.
Moreover, the Government of India Act of 1935, while a significant piece of legislation expanding the Indian electorate and provincial autonomy, did not provide for reserved seats for women specifically in the legislature. Women's representation was still a matter of contention, and reserved seats for women in various legislatures in India were instituted through different acts and over a period of time.