Final answer:
Jill's options in this situation depend on the specific terms of her agreement with Kevin and any applicable laws.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jill's options in this situation depend on the specific terms of her agreement with Kevin and any applicable laws in her jurisdiction. Based on the information provided, it is likely that Jill cannot rescind the agreement solely because she was mistaken in her estimate of the value of the auto. Generally, a party to a contract cannot avoid their obligations simply because they made a mistake or had a change of circumstances after entering into the agreement.
Jill may have a claim against Linda for detrimental reliance if she can show that she reasonably relied on Linda's intention to purchase the car and suffered damages as a result. Detrimental reliance occurs when a party incurs costs or takes actions based on another party's promise or representation, and the promise or representation is not fulfilled. However, the success of such a claim would depend on the specific facts and circumstances of Jill's case, as well as any applicable contract and consumer protection laws.
It is important for Jill to consult with a lawyer or legal professional to fully understand her rights and options in this situation, as contract law can vary depending on jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
She may not be able to rescind the agreement based solely on a mistaken estimate of the auto's value, but she may have a claim against Linda for detrimental reliance. Consulting with a lawyer or legal professional is advised.