Final answer:
The statement that authors recommend avoiding hypothetical examples in favor of real examples in speeches is false. Both types of examples have their place in speech and writing, and the use of each depends on context and purpose. Additionally, the provided true or false statements have been clarified with accurate information.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement suggesting that authors recommend avoiding hypothetical examples and instead using real examples in composing a speech is false. It may be a misunderstanding or a misinterpretation of the authors' advice. In fact, both hypothetical and real examples have their place in speech and writing, depending on the purpose and the context.
Real examples provide concrete evidence and can enhance the credibility and relatability of a speech, while hypothetical examples can be useful for illustrating a point or concept that may be more abstract. For the true or false exercise provided: When a theory has been known for a long time, it becomes a law. - False. The correct statement is that a theory does not become a law over time; they are distinct concepts in science.
A law describes what happens under certain conditions, while a theory explains why it happens. Many women found themselves incapable of handling the burdens of war when their husbands and fathers went off to fight. - False. It's historically inaccurate to generalize that many women were incapable, as many stepped up to take on roles left by men who went off to war.