The author contends that labeling the traditional art of tribal societies as "primitive" is inappropriate because it overlooks the complexity, cultural significance, and perpetuates Eurocentric biases.
The author believes that describing the traditional art of tribal societies as "primitive" is not appropriate. Here are some reasons supported by textual evidence:
1. The author argues that the term "primitive" oversimplifies and diminishes the complexity of tribal art. The author states, "The term 'primitive' fails to capture the intricate techniques and deep cultural meanings present in tribal art." This suggests that using such a label ignores the depth and sophistication of these art forms.
2. The author highlights that tribal art is rooted in cultural and spiritual traditions. By labeling it as primitive, the author suggests that we overlook the cultural significance of these art forms. As stated in the text, "Tribal art is a reflection of the rich cultural heritage and belief systems of these societies."
3. Another point made by the author is that using the term "primitive" perpetuates a Eurocentric bias. It implies that tribal art is less advanced or sophisticated compared to Western art. The author argues against this perspective, stating, "The notion of primitiveness carries a colonial mindset that diminishes the value of tribal artistic traditions."