Final answer:
A Commission-approved Counterproposal should address the main points of the original proposal, offer alternative solutions, and provide logical reasoning and evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to be effective, a Commission-approved Counterproposal should demonstrate an understanding of the purpose and relevance of the original proposal. It should clearly address and counter the main points and arguments presented in the proposal, offering alternative solutions or modifications. Additionally, it should provide logical reasoning, evidence, and examples to support the counterproposal.
For instance, if the original proposal suggests implementing new regulations to reduce air pollution, a Counterproposal could argue for investing in renewable energy sources as a more effective and sustainable solution. The Counterproposal should be written in an objective and trustworthy tone, considering the audience, context, and community expectations.
By meeting these criteria, a Commission-approved Counterproposal can effectively challenge the proposed solutions and present a strong alternative perspective.