Final answer:
It's not true that businesses must design databases sensitive to all global cultures. Databases should be flexible to accommodate diverse naming conventions and cultural practices, but the complexity of this task means that achieving perfect sensitivity is challenging and sometimes impractical.
Step-by-step explanation:
When dealing with international data, it is not true that designing a database sensitive to all global cultures is imperative for businesses as this can be incredibly challenging and sometimes not practical for all businesses. It is, however, important to consider different cultural norms and practices when designing databases. For instance, not all cultures break names into first and last, which is a common practice in many Western societies. Therefore, databases should be designed flexibly to accommodate various naming conventions from different cultures.
Grouping data effectively means being aware of the cultural diversity and complexity. There are no universally 'correct' tables, but rather tables can be designed to better reflect the cultural nuances of the data they contain. For example, while Western databases may traditionally use 'First Name' and 'Last Name' fields, other cultures may have a single field for the full name or even multiple fields for patronymic or matronymic elements.
The challenge of designing such databases lies in the rich diversity of practices in naming, language, and other cultural specifics. Companies that operate globally need to recognize and respect these differences, which makes the task of database design complex and requires careful planning and execution. Even though designing databases to fit every cultural need is difficult, there are clear advantages to creating more inclusive systems that recognize and cater to international diversity.