138k views
3 votes
If a train operator has a poor accident record, it would be logical to assume that the train operator _________.

1) is not responsible for the accidents
2) needs to improve safety measures
3) is not qualified to operate trains
4) has a good safety record

User Pvgoddijn
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

A train operator with a poor accident record likely needs to improve safety measures. This inference is based on the need for better practices to prevent accidents and does not necessarily mean the operator is unqualified or irresponsible.

Step-by-step explanation:

If a train operator has a poor accident record, the most logical assumption to make is that the train operator needs to improve safety measures. This is a signal that current practices may not be as effective as they should be for preventing accidents. In dealing with safety and accident prevention, one has to consider several factors. Not every accident is due to the operator's qualification or lack thereof; sometimes, it's about the systems and protocols in place. Improving safety measures could involve better training, more rigorous safety checks, or enhanced operating procedures.

In contrast, a poor accident record does not automatically mean the operator is not responsible, nor does it conclusively indicate that the operator is not qualified. It is an incorrect assumption to say that the train operator has a good safety record because a history of accidents is indicative of safety issues. Thus, the most appropriate and constructive action is to address and enhance safety measures.

User Kyrollos
by
7.8k points