Final answer:
All four options given in the question (Physical inspection, Task or job hazard analysis, Process analysis, and Incident investigation findings) are established methods of hazard identification. Therefore, none of them is an incorrect answer to the question about which method is not a form of hazard identification.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks which of the listed options is NOT a method of hazard identification. All four options provided in the question are recognized methods of hazard identification: Physical inspection, Task or job hazard analysis, Process analysis, and Incident investigation findings. As such, none of the options listed is incorrect. These methods help in identifying potential safety issues in the workplace and are used to prevent accidents and incidents.
Physical inspections involve observing conditions in the workplace. Task or job hazard analysis examines the steps involved in performing a specific task to identify possible risks. Process analysis looks at the entire process to identify potential hazards, while incident investigation findings review past incidents to determine what went wrong and why.
Moreover, enforcement by organizations like OSHA includes inspections to reduce injuries and accidents. The NFPA 704 Hazard Identification System provides safety information through a labeling system that indicates hazards associated with certain chemicals (e.g., flammability, reactivity, health risks). Both are important tools in hazard identification.