29.4k views
0 votes
To What Extent Was the US Constitution a Radical Departure

A) Constitutional Amendments
B) Historical Constitutional Analysis
C) Founding Fathers' Intentions
D) Revolutionary Constitutional Shifts

User Denvaar
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The US Constitution can be considered a radical departure due to its Constitutional Amendments, Historical Constitutional Analysis, Founding Fathers' Intentions, and Revolutionary Constitutional Shifts.

Step-by-step explanation:

The US Constitution can be considered a radical departure for several reasons:

  1. Constitutional Amendments: The Constitution provided a process for formal amendments, which allowed for changes to be made in response to societal and political changes. This flexibility was a departure from the Articles of Confederation, which lacked an effective mechanism for change.
  2. Historical Constitutional Analysis: Comparing the Constitution to previous forms of government, such as monarchies and aristocracies, reveals that the Constitution introduced a new system of government based on democratic principles and the separation of powers.
  3. Founding Fathers' Intentions: The Founding Fathers aimed to establish a government that balanced the power between the states and the national government, ensuring both representation and protection of individual rights. This departure from a purely centralized or purely decentralized system was radical at the time.
  4. Revolutionary Constitutional Shifts: The Constitution represented a significant shift in the structure of the government and the relationship between the individual states and the national government. It created a stronger central government while still preserving the autonomy of the states.

User Maksim Luzik
by
8.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.