Final answer:
The Democrats and Whigs in the second party system held differing views on the role of the federal government, appealing to different classes and regions. While direct comparisons to today's Democrats and Republicans are not straightforward due to ideological shifts, some parallels in political philosophy and electoral strategies can be drawn.
Step-by-step explanation:
When analyzing the similarities between the Democrats and Whigs in the second party system, several aspects can be considered such as political ideologies, historical context, party platforms, and electoral strategies. Both parties evolved their strategies to appeal to a broad range of voters, drawing on economic, regional, and moral issues to build their coalitions. The Democrats often attracted small farmers, urban workers, and immigrants, emphasizing their stance against an overpowering federal government and in favor of individual liberties. The Whigs, on the other hand, tended to rally support from wealthier classes like planters and urban businessmen, advocating for an active role of the government in promoting economic growth.
Comparing these historical parties to the Democrats and Republicans of today, one cannot directly equate them due to shifts in political stances over time. However, the historical Democrats' skepticism towards a strong federal government and the Whigs’ favor for government involvement in the economy can be paralleled, with some caution, to modern Republican and Democratic stances respectively. Furthermore, electoral strategies have similarly evolved, with both past and current parties adapting to the changing dynamics of voter bases and societal values.
.