Final answer:
The controversial nature of affirmative action raises questions about the purpose of the application process, with critics arguing that it can unintentionally disadvantage qualified individuals. Proponents believe it is necessary to promote diversity and equal access to opportunities.
Step-by-step explanation:
The controversial nature of affirmative action reveals that it raises an important question about the purpose of the application process. Is the goal of having individuals compete through an application process to ensure that a university or business is able to select only the best candidates, or is it to promote social goals like the representation of underrepresented groups?
Critics argue that affirmative action can unintentionally make it harder for qualified individuals from underrepresented groups to be taken seriously or fulfill their responsibilities. They believe that admissions and employment should be based solely on merit, and that affirmative action can unfairly preference less qualified candidates over more qualified ones.
On the other hand, proponents of affirmative action argue that it helps to promote diversity and equal access to opportunities for historically disadvantaged or underrepresented groups. They believe that it is necessary to address past discrimination and ensure equitable opportunities for all individuals.