Final answer:
The specific ECJ criteria for fortified food authorization procedures in France are not provided in the references, but in general, the ECJ would require the process to be accessible, transparent, efficient, with an appeal process, and based on scientific evidence without unjustifiable discrimination.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the criteria set by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for national authorisation procedures concerning fortified foods in France. While the provided references touch on various standards and regulations in the context of the WTO and the US FDA, they do not provide the specific criteria set by the ECJ for France. The most relevant aspects from the references include the necessity of scientific basis for food safety standards, non-discrimination between countries, and making sure that consumer products do not pose an unsafe risk.
In general, ECJ rulings would likely require such criteria to be accessible, transparent (well publicised), and efficient (quick), with a provision for an appeal process. They would also mandate that any prohibitive measures should be based on legitimate health risks and should not discriminate arbitrarily or unjustifiably among similar conditions in different countries. To obtain the specific ECJ criteria for fortified food authorization in France, one would need to consult the actual ECJ case or legal database detailing that decision.