Final answer:
Without judicial review, the balance of power between government branches would falter, with no judicial recourse to ensure laws adhere to the Constitution, potentially jeopardizing minority rights and democratic principles.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consequences of No Judicial Review
If courts did not have the power of judicial review, the checks and balances designed in the U.S. Constitution would be significantly weakened. This power, which the Supreme Court established for itself in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison, allows the judiciary to invalidate state and federal laws that contradict the Constitution. Without judicial review, legislative and executive branches could pass laws or take actions with no legal mechanism in place to ensure these laws adhere to the constitutional framework.
Furthermore, the absence of judicial review could result in a diminished protection of minority rights, as the judiciary often serves to safeguard the rights of individuals against the majority's will. The ability of the judiciary to declare governmental actions unconstitutional is crucial for maintaining the balance of power among the branches and to prevent any form of tyranny.