Final answer:
The claim that only accountable and maintenance significant assets are to be marked is false; marking applies to a broader range of material for proper supply chain and lifecycle management.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the requirement to mark material is limited to accountable and maintenance significant assets only is False. Material marking is a broad requirement that often extends beyond just accountable and maintenance significant assets. It includes applying identification measures to material to ensure proper handling, control, and visibility throughout the supply chain and lifecycle. Wide-ranging assets may require marking, including but not limited to, hazardous materials, sensitive items, assets with special storage requirements, and even non-accountable items in certain contexts for traceability and management.
CORRECT QUESTION:
The requirement to mark material is limited to accountable and maintenance significant assets only. True or False?