Final answer:
Whether state or federal cases come first in a string cite depends on the specific situation and the legal issues at stake. Context and jurisdictional relevance guide the order of citations. There is no universal rule, and choices are made based on the emphasis and preferences of the legal document.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering a string cite, whether state or federal cases come first can depend on the specific situation or the jurisdictional emphasis of the case at hand. In some instances, state cases may be cited first if they are more directly relevant or if they address the specific point being argued in greater detail. Conversely, federal cases might be cited first if they provide the controlling legal authority or if the case involves federal law. However, a universal rule for string citation order doesn't exist and can vary based on legal writing style or the preference of a specific jurisdiction. Overall, the context of the case and the relevant legal issues often guide the ordering of citations in legal documents.
It's important to note that cases can appear in both state and federal courts. A state case is more likely to be heard by the federal courts when it involves a federal question, like a violation of the U.S. Constitution or other federal laws. This interplay between state and federal jurisdictions shows that the distinctions are not always linear, and therefore, the decision on which to cite first could reflect this complexity depending on the key points of law.