Final answer:
The correct instrument used to assess the recency of experience with PIC is not provided among the listed options. Evaluations of a pilot's experience typically rely on the review of flight logs and training records rather than subjective questionnaires or interviews.
Step-by-step explanation:
The instrument used to assess the recency of experience with PIC (Pilot in Command), looking back 6 months, is not clearly identified among the provided options. However, in the context of psychological testing and memory assessment, tasks such as the three-word recall test are commonly used to evaluate an individual's memory function. While this specific test requires recalling three words after a short interval, it does not directly assess the recency of a PIC's experience. In a broader approach to assess changes in behavior or susceptibility over time, reliability scales might be used, just as the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) was utilized in research assessing police officers over a period of years to measure consistency and changes in response to job-related stress factors.
It's important to note that the specific term PIC recency assessment tool or similar variations are not established instruments in this context. If such an instrument is required for assessing a pilot's recent experience, it would typically involve a review of flight logs, training records, and any additional certifications or evaluations completed within the specified timeframe. The aviation industry relies on precise record-keeping and regular evaluations to ascertain a pilot's readiness and compliance with recency requirements.