Final answer:
The AR that covers the issues and sale of personal clothing isn't mentioned, but employment discrimination, as it pertains to religious apparel, is exemplified by a case involving Elauf and Abercrombie & Fitch. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires employers to accommodate religious practices, which Abercrombie failed to do.
Step-by-step explanation:
The AR (Army Regulation) that covers the issues and sale of personal clothing is not specified in this context. Instead, let's talk about the importance of non-discrimination in the context of employment. In the case of Elauf, who applied for a sales position at Abercrombie & Fitch, we see the application of anti-discrimination laws. Elauf was recommended for the position based on her qualifications, but she was not hired due to her religious practice of wearing a hijab. This action by Abercrombie & Fitch was found to be in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Title VII prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This federal law also mandates employers to accommodate an employee's religious practices, unless doing so would cause undue hardship on the business. In Elauf's case, her religious apparel, the hijab, should have been accommodated by the employer.