Final answer:
Complex critical thinkers systematically assess reasoning and evidence, while commitment thinkers maintain beliefs without rigorous examination and are influenced by social group norms. Critical thinking involves questioning one's own beliefs, seeking rational arguments, and is recognized as a skill set that can be improved with practice.
Step-by-step explanation:
Complex critical thinkers differ from commitment thinkers in their approach to reasoning and the assessment of evidence. Complex critical thinkers engage in a reflective and analytical process, assessing the facts and employing logic to avoid cognitive biases and mental shortcuts. On the other hand, commitment thinkers are more likely to hold onto beliefs without critically examining them, influenced by social conformity and the maintenance of belief systems that may be popular within certain groups.
Individuals that embrace complex critical thinking are willing to question their own perspectives and intuitions. They focus on reason and evidence to support claims, rigorously examining positions for flaws or inconsistencies. They also recognize the importance of challenging habitual thought patterns and the concept that claims must be more than mere opinions — they should be supported by rational argument.
Understanding the natural tendency of the mind to take shortcuts and the work required to engage in rational, critical reflection is a step towards becoming a more effective thinker. Critical thinkers employ a skill set that allows them to apply what they have learned in different contexts, think outside the box, and reach well-informed conclusions.