Final answer:
Minors may face additional duties when disaffirming contracts, including restitution for goods and compliance with state-specific requirements, such as in abortion cases. Legal responsibilities, informed by Supreme Court decisions, can be statutory and relate to broader principles like free exercise of religion.
Step-by-step explanation:
Courts in a growing number of states are imposing additional duties on minors when they seek to disaffirm contracts. Generally, when a minor disaffirms a contract, they must return any goods or property they still have that were received as part of the contract. In addition to this, these duties may also include compensating the adult party for the use of the goods or any depreciation in value since the contract was made. Furthermore, in cases such as abortion rights for minors, certain states require additional steps such as gaining parental consent or notifying a parent.
In context with other legal responsibilities, such as serving as a juror or in the armed forces, these are statutory requirements—legal duties imposed by various levels of government. The Supreme Court has addressed issues related to legal standards and responsibilities in several cases, including Wisconsin v. Yoder and Sherbert v. Verner, which relate to the free exercise of religion and its impact on legal obligations.