Question

What is true of peers as a source of performance information?

A: Peers do not have knowledge of job requirements.
B: Peers are uncomfortable with rating employees for decisions that may affect themselves.
C: Assessments of performance by peers generally lack any validity.
D: Peers are generally less favorable toward participating in reviews to be used for employee development.
E: Peers are poor sources of performance information in any job.

Answer 1

Peers are uncomfortable rating employees for decisions that may impact themselves (B), but can provide useful performance feedback if approached without bias. The effectiveness of performance appraisals, including peer feedback, depends on the system's implementation and the organization's culture.

Step-by-step explanation:

What is true of peers as a source of performance information is best reflected in option B: Peers are uncomfortable with rating employees for decisions that may affect themselves. Peers may indeed have knowledge of job requirements and can sometimes provide valid assessments of performance. Studies such as those by Atkins and Wood (2002) suggest that peer ratings can be unreliable, while Tornow (1993b) argues that discrepancies in peer reviews can foster discussion and learning, which can be beneficial for employee development. It's also important to note that peer assessments can be constructive, particularly if approached without bias and with a spirit of helpfulness, as peer reviewers can have the advantage of an external perspective.