Final answer:
Central Tendency is an example of an unintentional error, reflecting the tendency to rate all subjects with a mid-range score, which is indeed true. Errors like chance error, bias, and fundamental attribution error also play roles in distorting outcomes in research settings.
Step-by-step explanation:
The video in question appears to discuss rating errors in the context of performance evaluation or research. Regarding the statement that Central Tendency is an example of an unintentional error, the statement is True. Central Tendency as an error refers to the tendency of a reviewer to rate all subjects with a mid-point score, avoiding the high and low ends of the scale. This happens unintentionally when an evaluator may have a fear of giving extreme scores or may lack sufficient information to make a definitive assessment.
Other types of errors in research or judgment include chance error, bias, and fundamental attribution error. A chance error can occur if a sample size is too small and does not represent the population accurately. Bias occurs when a sample is not selected randomly, skewing the results. The fundamental attribution error is when people make judgments about behavior without considering situational factors.