Final answer:
The statement is true. Media coverage of the Green New Deal shows how media influences public perception through filtering, framing, and priming, which shapes public opinion and political outcomes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that coverage of the Green New Deal demonstrates all three media effects—filtering, framing, and priming—is true. Media content goes through a process of filtering, where only certain parts of a vast array of information reach the public. Media also uses framing, where information is presented within a particular context to influence interpretations. For instance, depending on how media outlets frame the Green New Deal, it can be seen either as a vital strategy to combat climate change or an unrealistic economic burden.
Additionally, the concept of priming entails the media predisposing the audience to a specific perspective, influencing subsequent judgments or reactions. For example, if a media outlet repeatedly presents the Green New Deal in conjunction with economic downturns or job losses, the public may later associate it with negative economic consequences, thus affecting their acceptance of political figures or policies associated with the initiative.
This phenomenon indeed aligns with the understanding of media influence on public perception, suggesting that media has the capacity, through various mechanisms, to guide public discussion, sentiment, and ultimately, political outcomes.