Final answer:
Reese was subjected to quid pro quo sexual harassment, which is an unlawful practice where employment benefits are exchanged for sexual favors. This type of harassment is illegal and can be grounds for legal action.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a supervisor offers a work-related reward in exchange for a sexual favor, this is known as quid pro quo sexual harassment. In the scenario described, Reese was presented with a proposition where her promotion was contingent upon her agreement to go on a date with her supervisor, which is a classic example of this unethical and illegal practice. Quid pro quo, which is Latin for "something for something," implies that a job benefit, such as a promotion, raise, or even continued employment, is dependent on the employee providing sexual favors.
It is important to recognize that such behavior is not only morally reprehensible but also violates equal employment opportunity laws in many jurisdictions. Victims of quid pro quo harassment can seek remedies through their company's human resources department or through legal action against the harasser and potentially the employer, depending on the circumstances and local laws.