Final answer:
Based on the passage, possible explanations for musicians who receive no applause for their performance could be that ``they are not very skilled performers (option A)`` or that`` they perform music that has no beauty(option B).``
The answer is option ⇒A and B
Step-by-step explanation:
The passage suggests that musicians who receive no applause for their performance may have different explanations. One possible explanation is that they are not very skilled performers (option A). This means that their technical abilities, such as playing the instrument or singing, may not be at a high level. As a result, their performance may not be engaging or impressive to the audience, leading to a lack of applause.
Another possible explanation is that the music they perform lacks beauty (option B). This means that the composition itself may not be aesthetically pleasing or emotionally moving to the listeners. If the music does not evoke any positive or inspiring emotions, the audience may not feel compelled to applaud.
The passage does not suggest that there is no truth in the music they perform (option C). Truth in music is a subjective concept and not directly addressed in the passage as a reason for the lack of applause.
Lastly, the passage does not mention that there is no one who understands the music they perform (option D). The lack of applause could be due to various reasons, and the passage does not specifically highlight a lack of understanding by the audience as a possible explanation.
The answer is option ⇒A and B
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was:
Ref: text `Cars MCAT`
The passage would suggest which of the following explanations for musicians who receive no applause for their performance?
A. They are not very skilled performers.
B. They perform music that has no beauty.
C. There is no truth in the music they perform
D. There is no one who understands the music they perform.