Final answer:
The results of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 can be compared to the data collected about the US Constitutional Convention in terms of consistency in outcomes, historical disparities, evolution of principles, and constitutional amendments.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Results of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in the United States can be compared to the data collected about the US Constitutional Convention.
A) Consistency in outcomes: Both conventions aimed to create a stronger federal government. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 resulted in the drafting of a new United States Constitution, while the data collected about the US Constitutional Convention shows consistency in the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation.
B) Historical disparities: The data collected about the US Constitutional Convention reflects the economic crisis of the 1780s, shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, and Shays' Rebellion. On the other hand, the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was influenced by the economic crisis, led by Federalists, and resulted in the oldest written constitution in the world.
C) Evolution of principles: The data collected about the US Constitutional Convention showcases how Americans took steps to define American equality and craft state constitutions. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 saw the evolution of principles such as the argument that led to the three-fifths rule and the consequences of that rule.
D) Constitutional amendments: The US Constitution ratified by the Constitutional Convention of 1787 has been subject to constitutional amendments over time, showcasing how the Constitution can adapt and change. The data collected about the US Constitutional Convention does not explicitly mention constitutional amendments, but it does discuss the conflicts over the ratification of the federal constitution, implying the potential for amendments.