178k views
5 votes
If a patient intends to harm themselves/another person, does that information remain confidential?

A. Yes, always
B. No, never
C. Yes, unless imminent danger
D. No, unless requested by the patient

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

The confidentiality of a patient with the intent to harm themselves or others remains in place unless there is imminent danger. Medical professionals may break confidentiality to prevent harm, following ethical guidelines and legal protocols. Patient privacy is complex and context-dependent, especially when involving STDs or minors.

Step-by-step explanation:

When it comes to the confidentiality of a patient intending to harm themselves or another person, the correct answer is C. Yes, unless imminent danger. Health care professionals are bound by ethical principles and legal duties to maintain patient confidentiality. However, there are exceptions to this rule, notably when a patient poses an imminent danger to themselves or others. In such cases, the physician may have a duty to warn the endangered person or take steps to prevent harm, which could include notifying law enforcement or other authorities. This is in accordance with the ethical standards of care and legal exceptions to confidentiality such as those outlined in the Tarasoff case, where mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals from threats posed by patients.

On the subject of doctors using medical knowledge to assist in the designing of interrogation techniques, most medical ethics bodies, including the American Medical Association, regard this as unethical.

In terms of privacy versus the right to know regarding sexually transmitted diseases, ethical guidelines and laws generally prioritize the right of partners to be informed over patient confidentiality, especially when there is a significant risk of harm. However, patient privacy is still highly valued, creating a complicated balance between these competing interests. In many jurisdictions, notifying partners about potential exposure to a sexually transmitted disease may be done without breaching privacy laws, but this can be complex and context-dependent.

When dealing with minors, patient privacy remains complex. While adolescents have a right to confidentiality in many areas, including sexual health, parents may have the legal right to certain information about their child's health. In practice, physicians must navigate these issues carefully, trying to encourage open communication with the minor while respecting both their need for confidentiality and the parents' right to be involved in their child's healthcare as appropriate under the law.

User Johannes Jander
by
8.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.