Final answer:
The correctness of PFC Gonrows statement can only be assessed with specific context and content. The statement should be evaluated for accuracy, perspective, and relevance based on historical evidence and its alignment with facts.
Step-by-step explanation:
Without specific context or content about PFC Gonrows statement, it is challenging to provide an accurate critique of what was right or wrong with the statement. In a historical context, assessments of statements can typically be based on accuracy, perspective, and relevance to the topic at hand.
When analyzing such statements, it's essential to consider the source, the intention behind the statement, and the historical evidence that supports or contradicts it. If PFC Gonrow's statement is aligned with documented evidence and is conveyed in a manner that is respectful and professional, then it could be considered 'not wrong.' Conversely, if the statement includes factual inaccuracies, misrepresents historical contexts, or contains biases without acknowledging them, it could be considered 'wrong.'
The determination of the correctness of any statement requires a full understanding of its content, the context in which it was made, and the surrounding circumstances.