217k views
2 votes
What is the best explanation of why iron requires a Roman numeral when naming an ion of iron, but zinc does not?

A) Zinc is monovalent
B) Iron is divalent
C) Iron forms multiple ions
D) Zinc is a transition metal

User Djasper
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

Iron requires a Roman numeral in its ion nomenclature because it can form multiple ions (Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺), which necessitates a distinction in naming. Zinc only forms a single common ion (Zn²⁺), so no Roman numeral is required.

Step-by-step explanation:

The best explanation of why iron requires a Roman numeral when naming an ion of iron, but zinc does not is because iron forms multiple ions with different charges, specifically Fe²⁺ and Fe³⁺. This is in contrast to zinc, which only forms one common ion, Zn²⁺, and thus there is no need for a Roman numeral to distinguish between different ionic charges.

In the Stock system of nomenclature for ions of transition metals with variable charges, the charge is indicated by a Roman numeral in parentheses, such as iron(II) for Fe²⁺ and iron(III) for Fe³⁺. When naming compounds containing these ions, distinguishing between the different charges is crucial because they can form different compounds with unique properties.

User Roger Carvalho
by
8.3k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.