Final answer:
The claim that organic foods have higher nutrient content is not consistently supported by recent research. Other benefits, such as lower pesticide residues and reduced environmental impact, are supported, but the claim about nutrients shows mixed results without clear evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement about organic foods that is NOT consistently supported by recent research is the claim of higher nutrient content. While organic foods often have lower pesticide residue and may have a reduced environmental impact due to less reliance on synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, research on whether organic foods offer higher nutrient content compared to conventional foods has shown mixed results, without consistent evidence to support the claim. Taste is quite subjective, so claims of better taste are not consistently verifiable, but regarding the question options, it's the nutrient content claim that is less consistently supported by scientific research.
One of the benefits of organic foods is their reduced dependence on chemicals like fertilizers and pesticides, which aligns with organic agriculture principles. However, this is not directly related to the measurable nutrient content of the food. Additionally, organic foods may be more expensive due to the theories of supply and demand, as there has been an increase in preference for safer, organic options, leading to increased demand and subsequently higher prices.