Final answer:
The McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) ruling is true in stating that the Second Amendment is an individual right, incorporating this right to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. The Supreme Court's decision affirmed the fundamental nature of the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense, applicable at the state level.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) ruling also stated that the Second Amendment is an individual right is true. This decision followed the earlier District of Columbia v. Heller case which in 2008 declared that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home. In McDonald v. Chicago, the Supreme Court held that this individual right extends to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, affirming that the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms for self-defense is a fundamental right that is fully applicable to the states.
The decision, which was a 5-4 ruling, concluded that the right to keep and bear arms is essential to maintaining liberty, and must also be recognized at the state level. However, the ruling does not imply that gun rights are absolute, as various gun control laws have been upheld by the courts since then, suggesting that restrictions may be constitutionally permissible as long as they do not violate the core protections granted by the Second Amendment.