Final answer:
Critics of growth policies usually argue against aspects like income inequality, environmental degradation, and social unrest, rather than technological advancement, which they view as a potential solution to these issues.
Step-by-step explanation:
Critics of growth policies focus on several arguments, each highlighting different aspects of why they believe growth may not always lead to positive outcomes. These critics highlight concerns such as income inequality, environmental degradation, and social unrest.
They argue that policies solely focused on economic growth can exacerbate these issues. Among the options provided (a) income inequality, (b) environmental degradation, (c) technological advancement, and (d) social unrest, the one that is not usually a focus of growth policy criticism is (c) technological advancement. Critics generally view technological advancement as beneficial or neutral rather than a negative consequence of growth policies.
Technological advancement is often seen as a driver of efficiency and progress, potentially leading to economic growth, employment opportunities, and improvements in quality of life. Instead of being a point of criticism, it is usually considered a solution to some of the problems associated with growth, such as environmental sustainability and alleviating poverty through innovation and improved productivity.
It's important to note that the environmental and social issues mentioned by critics relate to the unwanted consequences of poorly managed growth rather than growth itself.