Final answer:
The statement is true; effective gross income (EGI) is more important than potential gross income because it accounts for vacancy and collection losses, providing a realistic estimate of actual income from a real estate property. Option a
Step-by-step explanation:
The effective gross income (EGI) is indeed a better indicator of the actual financial performance of a real estate property than the potential gross income. This is because EGI accounts for vacancy and collection losses, providing a more realistic perspective. Potential gross income, on the other hand, does not consider the inevitable imperfections of the real estate market, such as non-paying tenants or periods of vacancy.\\
Real estate investors and property managers use EGI to forecast the real income that will be generated, including allowances for vacancies and credit losses. It also encapsulates any additional income streams the property might have. In contrast, potential gross income represents the maximum possible income if the property were fully leased at all times without any credit loss.
EGI is, therefore, essential for realistic financial planning and investment analysis in real estate, as it mirrors the likely income after the realities of the market are taken into account. Option a