13.6k views
1 vote
If you do a hypothesis test for the mean and you used a t-test instead of a test involving z, and everything else remained the same, your p-value for the t-test would be compared to the p-value for the test involving z.

a. smaller
b. the same
c. larger
d. not predictable

User Pedrofb
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Using a t-test instead of a z-test generally results in a larger p-value, due to the t-distribution's heavier tails compared to the normal distribution. This difference decreases as sample size increases.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you perform a hypothesis test for the mean and you used a t-test instead of a test involving z, and everything else remained the same, your p-value for the t-test would generally be larger compared to the p-value for the test involving z. This is because the t-distribution has heavier tails than the normal distribution, which is used for the z-test, thus resulting in a larger area (and therefore a larger p-value) in the tails of the distribution. This effect is especially noticeable with smaller sample sizes, where the difference between the t-distribution and the normal distribution is most pronounced. As the sample size increases, the t-distribution approaches the normal distribution, and the p-values from the t-test and z-test would become similar.

.

User Roozbeh
by
8.1k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories