Final answer:
The idea that laws dictate the use of computers is false, as laws are generalized statements about natural patterns and can be revised with new evidence. Computers operate on principles grounded in physical laws, which describe the natural world and its functioning.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the essential element that controls how computers are used is a law is FALSE. Scientific laws are generalized patterns in nature that are supported by scientific evidence and can be described concisely, often through mathematical equations. While laws and theories are both outcomes of tested hypotheses, a law is a concise statement, such as Newton's second law of motion (F = ma), and a theory is a less concise explanation of phenomena. In the context of technology, laws can shape the use and development through regulations and patents. However, the fundamental operations of computers are governed by physical laws, and these cannot be altered; they simply describe how the universe operates. If new evidence surfaces that contradicts an existing law, the law can be revisited or changed.
The essential element that controls how computers are used is not a law, but rather a set of rules and principles that govern the operation and utilization of computers. These rules and principles are not the same as laws in the legal sense, but they serve as guidelines and standards that dictate how computers should be designed, programmed, and utilized. For example, there are rules regarding data privacy and security, programming best practices, and ethical considerations when using computers.