Final answer:
Comparative analysis relies on highlighting similar traits where diversity is minor, often resulting in a strong argument. Analytical comparison emphasizes differences with diversity as a crucial factor, which can lead to a weak argument if not well-connected to an overarching theme. Contextual examination, which focuses on diversity within context, typically forms strong arguments, while generalized assessment that disregards diversity often leads to weak conclusions.
Step-by-step explanation:
To indicate the instances being compared, one might look at two literary works to analyze similarities and differences within their themes, character development, or narrative structures. When engaging in a comparative analysis, the focus is on highlighting similar traits that establish a foundation for comparison, despite the fact that diversity among the instances can be a minor factor in strengthening an argument.
In the case of an analytical comparison, differences are at the forefront and diversity is deemed a crucial factor. Here, the argument may be perceived as weak if the analysis relies too heavily on the aspects that separate the items being compared without adequately connecting them to an overarching theme or question.
Contextual examination emphasizes the diverse attributes of the instances and considers diversity essential. By situating the subjects within their specific contexts and drawing out unique qualities, the argument tends to be strong, especially when it illuminates new insights into each case's individuality or the collective understanding of a theme.
Lastly, a generalized assessment that mainly notes dissimilarities without considering the relevance of diversity to the subjects being compared often results in a weak argument. It lacks depth and may not address the nuances necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the subjects in relation to one another.