Final answer:
The statement 'Just like fat makes forensics of sparse files difficult actually does not save makes forensics easier' is false. The difficulty in analyzing sparse files in digital forensics is not caused by the use of fat file systems, and fat file systems do not make forensics easier either.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Just like fat makes forensics of sparse files difficult actually does not save makes forensics easier' is false. Fat, which stands for File Allocation Table, is a file system used by older versions of Microsoft Windows operating systems. Sparse files, on the other hand, are files that contain empty or unused space. While it is true that analyzing sparse files can be challenging in digital forensics, this difficulty is not caused by the use of fat file systems. In fact, the use of fat file systems does not make forensics easier either.
Digital forensics involves the investigation and analysis of digital evidence, such as files, data, and metadata, to uncover information related to criminal activities. The challenges in analyzing sparse files mainly arise from the way these files are structured and stored, as well as the tools and techniques used in forensic investigations. Sparse files can have gaps or uninitialized areas, and their data may be scattered across multiple locations in a storage device, making it more complex to recover and analyze the information they contain.
To successfully analyze sparse files in digital forensics, forensic investigators rely on specialized tools that can recognize and reconstruct the file structure, identify and recover the relevant data, and interpret the information within the context of the investigation. These tools are designed to handle various file systems, including fat and newer file systems like NTFS, which was introduced with later versions of Windows.