The slide on the right may be more visually appealing due to the use of infographics, adherence to the short-to-long principle for better readability, clear and informative titles, effective use of space and contrast, as well as a focus on the main subject in images.
The slide on the right is considered more eye-catching and visually appealing than the slide on the left for several reasons. One factor is the use of infographics, which are known to attract attention due to their combination of visuals and information. Additionally, the slide might follow the short-to-long principle, which creates a fluid and easy-to-read format by ordering elements from shortest to longest, ensuring that the content is engaging and accessible.
Furthermore, the effective title such as 'The Syrian War' immediately informs viewers of the content, making the slide intriguing. Effective use of space, such as the positioning of captions against a contrasting background, enhances readability and visual attraction. Finally, making the main subject more prominent in images, by, for example, filling the frame, can significantly increase the impact and focus of a slide.
The question probably maybe:
Why is the slide on the right considered more eye-catching and visually appealing than the slide on the left? Select all that apply.
It uses analogous text colors.
It uses contrasting text colors.
It uses complementary text colors.
It uses the hierarchy of visual design.
none of the above