Final answer:
The procedures for handling enemy prisoners of war are complex and vary depending on the context. The U.S. has faced scrutiny over its treatment of detainees at places like Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib. Standardized protocols are influenced by both military procedures and international law, but a specific universally recognized sequence like those listed in the question does not exist.
Step-by-step explanation:
When discussing the procedures for handling Detainees/Enemy Prisoner Of War (EPOW), one must consider the historical and legal contexts. During various conflicts, such as those in Afghanistan and Iraq, the U.S. military operations have resulted in the capture and detention of individuals deemed enemy combatants. The Guantanamo Bay detention camp, known for its detention and interrogation of suspects, is a notable example of where such individuals have been held. The handling of these detainees follows a particular protocol aimed at maintaining security, upholding legal standards, and respecting human rights despite controversies, as seen in the cases of Guantanamo Bay and the Abu Ghraib abuses.
However, the precise sequence articulated by the student—Seize, Detain, Process, Guard, Release or Search, Detain, Escort, Process, Release or Secure, Detain, Evaluate, Process, Report or Seize, Detain, Extract, Process, Review—does not correspond with a universally recognized or standardized procedure, as the specifics can vary by military branch, operation, and evolving legal interpretations.
It is also important to note that the handling of EPOWs is subject to international laws and treaties, such as the Geneva Conventions, which include stipulations on the fair treatment and rights of prisoners of war. Despite, in some cases, designations of "enemy combatant" to circumvent the protections offered to prisoners of war, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on issues of jurisdiction and due process, granting detainees at Guantanamo the habeas corpus right to challenge their detention in federal court.