Final answer:
The statement that there is no difference in political behavior between "strong party identifiers" and "weak party identifiers" is false. Strong identifiers are consistent in their partisanship and behavior, while weak identifiers exhibit less consistency in their political behavior.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that there is no difference in political behavior between "strong party identifiers" and "weak party identifiers" is False. Strong party identifiers exhibit a higher level of commitment to their party's platform and candidates, often voting strictly along party lines and actively participating in party activities. They are also more likely to contribute financial support to their party and may attend party events. These patterns contrast with weak party identifiers, who display less consistent partisanship, may switch party allegiance more readily, and are affected less by party loyalty in their voting behavior.
Research shows that party identification significantly influences voting behavior. People often use political parties as heuristics to guide their decisions, particularly in the absence of detailed information about candidates or issues. Even voters who consider themselves independents tend to lean towards one party and generally vote in line with that preference. Hence, those with strong party identification are more predictable in their voting habits compared to weak identifiers or independents, indicating a clear difference in political behavior.