Final answer:
A quality inherent to systematic reviews is their ability to merge information from diverse studies into a comprehensive report, highlighting their reproducible methodology and aim to minimize bias. They provide an overview of existing research by utilizing systematic data collection and are not characterized by reducing sample sizes or incorporating both research and non-research literatures.
Step-by-step explanation:
The quality that would always be part of systematic reviews is that they allow the merging of information from diverse studies into one report. Systematic reviews are defined by their comprehensive and reproducible methodology, which typically includes identifying, appraising, and synthesizing all the available evidence according to pre-specified criteria. A vital feature of systematic reviews is their aim to minimize bias by using explicit, systematic methods documented in advance.
Systematic reviews must show awareness of the research already done in the field, gathering data through meticulous search strategies and often by using several databases. The data collected is usually both qualitative and quantitative. Contrary to reducing sample sizes, systematic reviews embrace the coordination of large samples and diverse data to provide a comprehensive overview of the available research on a particular topic.
Systematic reviews do not necessarily incorporate reviews of both research and non-research literatures; rather, they focus on synthesizing research literature. Similarly, they do not aim to reduce sample sizes but instead aggregate data from across various studies to increase the robustness of their findings. Moreover, not all systematic reviews involve standard sampling; the procedure methodology varies per the research question and available literature.