Final answer:
There is a relationship inferred about the question of slavery when comparing maps from after the Missouri Compromise and the 1828 election, as the divisive issue of slavery is reflected in both maps, showing how slavery continued to be central to American politics.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to whether there is an inferred relationship about the slavery question using maps from after the Missouri Compromise in 1820 and from the presidential election of 1828. When analyzing the Missouri Compromise map, we observe that slave states, including Missouri, are marked in red, and free states in blue, with the green Missouri Compromise line at 36°30' indicating where slavery would be prohibited in the northern part of the Louisiana Purchase lands. The map from the presidential elections following the Missouri Compromise shows that the issue of slavery continued to be a central and divisive factor, as reflected in the support patterns for Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay concerning the extent to which slavery should expand into new territories or states.
True to historical events, slavery was a topic that deeply affected American politics, dividing the nation both geographically and politically. By comparing these maps, one can infer that there is a relationship between the divisions of free and slave states established by the Missouri Compromise and the later political alignments which were often influenced by attitudes toward slavery. This analysis connects the burgeoning sectional conflict of the time with the increasing difficulty of maintaining a balance between slave and free states and foreshadows the intensifying national division that would lead to the Civil War.