Final answer:
Harry, by enjoying the debate and examining each position's pros and cons, is engaging in postformal thought, a level of cognitive development that recognizes the relativity of knowledge and incorporates context in problem-solving.
Step-by-step explanation:
The discussion in Professor Edokpa's evening program on whether human rights are universal or culturally variable involves complex cognitive processes. Harry, who enjoys debating the pros and cons of each position, is engaging in postformal thought. This level of thought goes beyond the adolescent stage of formal operations, becoming more flexible, logical, and willing to accept contradictions, reflecting a mature understanding that knowledge can be relative and that solutions must be found in context. Examples of postformal thinking can be seen in political actions and decisions, such as Egyptians protesting government corruption in 2011, which was based on a higher level of morality that distinguishes legality from morality.
Postformal thinkers, like Harry, embrace the complexities and inconsistencies in human behavior and are capable of addressing real-world problems. They are aware of differences in moral codes among cultures and understand that societal norms can influence the interpretation of human rights. Hence, in the context of the student debate, Harry's approach exemplifies a more nuanced understanding of human rights and cultural relativism.