Question

List 3 common perspectives on why some people are more likely to be designated leaders than others and how leaders emerge in the absence of or in addition to a designated leader.

Answer 1

There are three common perspectives on leadership styles - democratic, laissez-faire, and authoritarian. Leaders can also emerge in the absence or addition to a designated leader, with spontaneous leadership in hunter-gatherer societies and varying styles of leadership in secondary groups.

Step-by-step explanation:

There are three common perspectives on why some people are more likely to be designated leaders than others. The first perspective is based on the leadership style of democratic leaders who encourage group participation in decision making, build consensus, and work towards a collective course of action. The second perspective is of laissez-faire leaders who are hands-off, allowing group members to self-manage and make their own decisions. The third perspective is of authoritarian leaders who issue orders and assign tasks.

In addition to these designated leadership styles, leaders can also emerge in the absence or addition to a designated leader. In hunter-gatherer societies, leadership was determined spontaneously based on prowess and personality. In secondary groups, such as workplaces or classrooms, formal leadership roles exist, but the styles and functions of leadership can vary significantly.

These different perspectives on leadership styles and emergence of leaders highlight the importance of considering various factors such as group dynamics, individual characteristics, and societal contexts when examining leadership.