Final answer:
The claim that Samuel records only positive aspects of King David's reign is false; biblical and archaeological sources present a nuanced view of his life and reign.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Samuel records only the highlights and positive episodes in King David's reign is false. The historical records, particularly from the Bible, present a complex picture of King David's reign, including both his successes and his failures. While some medieval works, such as illuminated manuscripts, might depict King David in a predominantly positive light, the biblical portrayal includes a more nuanced account of his life, including his shortcomings and the challenges he faced. Additionally, the archaeological evidence, like the Tel Dan stele that refers to the "house of David," does not provide a complete narrative of his reign but confirms his historical existence.