Final answer:
In legal cases, the standard of proof required differs depending on the type of case. In a criminal case, guilt must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, while in a civil case, the plaintiff must prove their case beyond a preponderance of the evidence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The subject of this question is Law.
In legal cases, when it comes to determining guilt or innocence, the standard of proof required differs depending on the type of case. In a criminal case, the state must prove guilt 'beyond a reasonable doubt', meaning that the evidence presented must leave no doubt in the minds of the jury that the defendant committed the crime. On the other hand, in a civil case, the plaintiff must prove their case 'beyond a preponderance of the evidence', meaning that the evidence presented weighs more on their side than the defendant's.
Given the options provided, the determination based on a preponderance of the evidence would be 'C) Negligence' in a civil case.