Final answer:
The statement about spreading U.S. boundaries as a means of spreading freedom is subjective and not universally true. The stated goals of U.S. foreign policy are inclusive of the safety, market access, and human rights. Both a person standing up and a car accelerating are correct examples of motion.
Step-by-step explanation:
In addressing the statement, "spreading the boundaries of the United States was equivalent to spreading freedom," it is important to be mindful of historical context and perspectives. The idea of manifest destiny held that American expansion was both justified and inevitable. However, this sort of expansion often came at the expense of the sovereignty and rights of indigenous peoples as well as other nations. Thus, the notion that such expansion equated to the spread of freedom is not universally true and is rather subjective.
When considering the goals of U.S. foreign policy as outlined in the options, it is correct to indicate that all of the above are goals of U.S policy, which include keeping the country safe, securing access to foreign markets, and protecting human rights.
In physics, examples provided like a person standing up from a seated position and a car accelerating while driving demonstrate instances of motion and energy. Therefore, the correct response is C. both of the above.
Lastly, for question looking at organisms and ecosystems, Fungi are indeed part of the discussion about ecosystems, and thus D. All of the above could be a correct answer depending on the preceding context.