Final answer:
Contractors supporting forces is not a new phenomenon, and women have historically managed war burdens effectively. Recruiting native allies was crucial in the Spanish conquest of the Aztec, and Revolutionary war soldiers were not well rewarded. The market revolution significantly changed the U.S. economically and socially, and the First Reconstruction Act divided the South into military districts.
Step-by-step explanation:
Contractors supporting deployed forces are not a new phenomenon. This practice has been observed historically, and technology and military contract work have existed for many years. The statement that many women found themselves incapable of handling the burdens of war when their husbands and fathers went off to fight is false. In many conflicts throughout history, women have stepped up to assume roles previously reserved for men, showing resilience and capability in facing wartime challenges. Similarly, the statement concerning the importance of recruiting native allies during the Spanish conquest of the Aztec Empire is true. Hernán Cortés and his conquistadors significantly benefited from the support of indigenous populations who were discontented with Aztec rule.
Regarding the American Revolution, it is false that Revolutionary war soldiers were well rewarded for their service. Many soldiers received very little compensation for their participation in the conflict. Loyalists, those who remained faithful to the British Crown, were not well treated after the war, contrary to what might be presumed; therefore, the statement that Loyalists were protected by the treaty and well treated after it was signed is false.
The market revolution's significant impact on social and economic aspects in the United States is true. It brought about numerous changes, including shifts in production, labor, and patterns of consumption. Lastly, according to the First Reconstruction Act passed in 1867, the South was indeed divided into military districts, making this statement true.