Final answer:
The claim that Special Access Programs are not subject to Congressional oversight is false as certain members of Congress do have oversight responsibilities over SAPs. Furthermore, the necessary and proper clause has expanded, not limited, the power of the national government.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that Special Access Programs (SAPs) are not subject to Congressional oversight is false. While SAPs are designed to control access, and distribution, and provide protection for sensitive information beyond the normal security clearance levels, they are still subject to oversight from select members of Congress to ensure legality and accountability. This oversight comes in forms such as closed-session briefings and reports.
Regarding the subject of domestic policymaking versus foreign policymaking, two key differences include the centralized nature of foreign policymaking, which typically involves the President and the executive branch, and the broader range of stakeholders involved in domestic policymaking, including Congress, state governments, and the public. Additionally, foreign policy often deals with international relations and national security, while domestic policy focuses on issues within the country, such as healthcare and education.