Final answer:
While workgroup processes are believed to improve collaboration, creating data silos through these processes typically leads to reduced data integration and decreased data consistency across an organization. Bureaucracies aim for increased productivity and efficiency, while small groups can handle collective action problems more effectively.
Step-by-step explanation:
One advantage that workgroup processes have compared to enterprise systems is that they can improve collaboration within a team or department. Contrary to the assertion that workgroup processes reduce data integrity problems by creating data silos, these silos can actually lead to issues such as reduced data integration and decreased consistency in data across different parts of an organization. Data silos are isolated pockets of data that are controlled by one department and are not readily accessible by other parts of the organization, which can lead to redundancy and inconsistency of data.
When considering the intended positive aspects of bureaucracies, aspects like increased productivity and increased efficiency are often highlighted, reflecting the potential for structured processes to streamline operations and decision-making on a large scale. In addition, collective action problems such as free-riding are less severe in small, more manageable groups where behavior is easier to monitor and peer pressure is more effective at enforcing norms.