Final answer:
Traditional models of formal operational thinking prioritize objective thought while undervaluing subjective thought, correlating with objective and subjective approaches in science and morality.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question refers to the contrast in cognitive development stages as described by Jean Piaget and subsequent psychologists who introduced the concept of postformal thought. Traditional models of formal operational thinking value objective thought and devalue subjective thought. The formal operational stage, usually reached during adolescence, is characterized by the ability to think abstractly and to coordinate theory with evidence, which leans towards objectivity rather than subjective reasoning.
In the context of science, these two modes of thinking are related to descriptive science and hypothesis-based science, illustrating the objective versus subjective approaches to understanding phenomena.
Moral realists further cement the value of objectivity as they argue for objective moral truths, contrasting moral skeptics who emphasize the subjective nature of moral reasoning.